Little Nothings

Pieces of a discrepant diary

bloggy useless

What is a blog?

a message to someone
a personal diary
somewhere people can chit-chat to while away boredom
a collaborative shared interest site
a political platform
somewhere to share stories
a porn sex site
a creative sketchpad
somewhere to record a journey
a different way to communicate
somewhere for me to be me

What is a blog?

from Dictionary.com
"an online diary"
"a personal chronological log of thoughts published on a Web page"
"a personal Web site that provides updated headlines and news articles of other sites that are of interest to the user, also may include journal entries, commentaries and recommendations compiled by the user"

What is a blog?

As a word? Bloody useless!

Labels:

nah, yeh

Some stuff I need to record here and get out of my head.

Two quotes by Edward Bond (playwright),

"If you want to escape violence, you don't say 'violence is wrong,' you alter the conditions that create violence."

"Violence shapes and obsesses our society, and if we do not stop being violent we have no future. People who do not want writers to write about violence want to stop them writing about us and our time. It would be immoral not to write about violence."

It is unfortunate and very sad that someone should have to commit suicide to have their voice heard. Unfortunate but it would appear, for Sarah Kane, necessary. Sarah was a playwright whose work contained scenes of violence, cruelty, mental anguish and psychological distress, some of which appear to be drawn from her own life. Her early work was misinterpreted and seen as brutal and disgusting. There is speculation that she intended her final play to be produced posthumously and indeed after writing it, at barely 28 she tried to commit suicide, was then taken to hospital, where it seems she did manage to hang herself with her own shoelaces. Following her death, her work has been taken more seriously.

Sarah suggested,

"that society is chronically insane and that in order to function in this insanity one needs to deaden one’s capacity to feel and perceive, to switch off a part of the mind, or ... 'to embrace beautiful lies' "

Edward Bond illustrated this type of chronic insanity,

"We live rational daily lives but our societies make grotesque weapons, economically destroy their environment, make some rich and others poor, some powerful and others impotent and in these and other ways are flagrantly unjust."

In Sarah's play, 4:48 psychosis,

"one of the voices in the play experiences just over an hour of sanity every morning from 4.48am. At all other times, they claim, they cannot touch their essential self: 'When it has passed, I shall be gone again, a fragmented puppet, a grotesque fool.' It is, however, when they regard themselves as insane and grotesque that they are regarded as sane by others ... This raises one of the key questions highlighted in the play: who defines what is and is not sane and according to what criteria?"

I guess I'm trying to express something here but I ain't sure what it is yet.

I'm reading a book at the moment, about the difficulties people sometimes have with expression and communication. It's about a group of people, unable to make themselves understood, some through physical disability, some through psychological inability. But in a way it's also about how we all to some extent, are sealed within our own minds.

It's a curious challenge this, the ability to express the true essence of our thought, the ability or inability to make someone else understand.

Labels:

an insane world

I was making tea, the radio was blurting out more killings in that reality TV program, what's it called, "Pop Genocide - Choose The Survivor"?

Some bloke called George Bush was saying: "Today I spoke to our Generals ... " but I'm afraid I lost the motivation to remember the rest, so can't enlighten you as to what the generals may have told him.

None of this is new of course. There was a 1987 pilot for the current show, a film called Running Man starring Arnold Schwarzenegger. That was just a taster, a few guilty individuals pitched against each other in a life and death struggle which served to entertain the public. What we have here has so much more. I mean, we get to hear of loads of guilty and evil people being killed every day, and not just killed, but beheaded, raped, private parts mutilated, etc. Whoever thought that a ridiculous science fiction film would ever become reality?

Of course it's a bit frustrating as we can't see the killing directly, the mutilated naked bodies, the dried blood, the frozen expressions of fear and terror. We only get to hear about it. It's a bit like comparing the Archers to Eastenders. We have to use our imagination. And I think it's a bit mean that we don't get to hear about all the killings. I mean how can the public be entertained if they only get the 40 evil ones killed there by a car bomb or the 30 killed here by summary execution. What about the individuals, the men and the women?

Do you think the financial cost of this show means the annual TV license charge will go up? Now I don't know about you but I simply don't agree with that. Surely it would be better if they cut costs on the set, maybe by murdering a few less people. Mind you, it is about time they changed the scenery, don't you think?. It's been quite samey for a while now. You'd think they could move on to a different country or at least choose people with a different skin colour.

And I think the ratings would improve if they could score. You know, put up a proper daily scoreboard and tell us the body count for married women, plumbers, the under 5's and the like.

Now if lived in a sane world, I wouldn't expect to see George Bush, Tony Blair or their entourages continue their roles in government until an independent investigation had taken place, to assess their ongoing conduct and whether they had been guilty of inciting hatred on the basis of fear. But of course what independent body exists that could perform such an investigation? Luckily there's no need to worry about these complex problems because we live in cloud cuckoo land. Much easier for us that we get to vote for them again and again, using the red button on the remote. Democracy, this thing that enables us, gives us our freedom, allows us to effect change. To change the world and vote for issues instead of people. Oh, hang on, sorry, slip-up. I mean people instead of issues. For the people who brought us the greatest reality TV show of all.

Labels:

a memory of mountains

Somewhere from within the void of childhood memory, is a vague image: the smell of damp grass, the sound of stream water tinkering over rocks, looking up to see vast mountain sides disappearing into the clouds. I think I'd been let out of the family car and was standing, shorts round my ankles, my wee winkie out in the fresh air peeing into a huge trench. I probably wasn't yet eight years old.

Some twenty years later I was driving through Glen Shiel and had stopped for a pee by a ditch. As I looked up at the slopes of Sgurr na Ciste Duibhe disppearing into the clouds, I became aware of the smell of grass, damp from recent rain, and I heard the sound of a stream, dropping from the Corrie above. Slowly I realised why the place seemed familiar. On both occasions I'd probably been peeing into an old Jacobite defensive trench from the 1719 Battle of Glen Shiel, the last time that foreign troops would be engaged in battle on mainland British soil.

The memory of these infinitely high mountains, The Five Sisters of Kintail, may be what drew me to the outdoors and eventually to the hills.

Other memories are also hard to retrieve from the void. I do recollect trying to escape a factory job by roughing it, outdoors at weekends. There are flashbacks of walking for long distances along roads, shouldering a heavy backpacking rucksack and camping in fields, completely exhausted. I would pitch an old wet heavyweight-cotton tent, often in rain and often wearing sodden constricting denim jeans. There was no sewn in groundsheet so nights were shivery and damp. These were gruelling tests, so exhausting and painful that it was a relief to be back at work.

I began to hitch-hike around Scotland and before long, knew all the junctions, the best places to catch a lift and most hitching tricks of the trade, skills that would be useful in later years when I hitched lifts to the Lake District, Wales, and even as far off as the Italian Alps.

At some stage I must have progressed from walking along roads to climbing mountain paths. I recall one particular night camping in Glencoe during a gale. Catching odd winks of sleep, sat upright, desperately clutching my one tent pole while powerful veering winds tried to rip it and the sodden tent away into the night. Another occasion camped below Ben Nevis. This time with the luxury of a sewn in groundsheet. Unfortunately lack of waterproofing in the tent outer resulted in a three inch deep puddle of water which had been slowly absorbed by my lightweight summer sleeping bag.

Those desperate early experiences should have killed any enthusiasm. In fact, all the cold shivery nights, the shoulders worn raw from heavy rucksack straps, the blistered feet, these served only as a strange rite of passage. One made complete when, one day during my late teens I stood on the summit of Sgurr nam Fiannaidh, Glencoe, having completed the the Aonach Eagach Ridge, wearing tweed breeches, woollen chequered shirt, ill fitting boots and tartan bunnet. My first true mountaineer's achievement.

On that peak, almost three thousand feet above the Clachaig Inn, I stumbled into a German au pair. A good looking girl with long flowing blonde hair who made breeches look like clothing worth getting into. She was on a hill-walking weekend break from her Summer holiday job - looking after the kids for a family somewhere in Edinburgh. As I found out later, after a few hours of drinking and trying to sing German campfire songs in the Clachaig, looking after kids wasn't the only thing she was good at.

On that day I passed the initiation ceremony, became a man and became a mountaineer.

I'd found something meaningful to do, something to balance out the daily grind of working life. I'd discovered nature, beauty, wild places ... and one or two other things ...

Labels:

A focused morning

It's morning!
I'm completely focused and ready for the day.
An MP3 player is wired to my earphone and I'm sitting at the computer, catching the news.
Just finished a breakfast of half a grapefruit and a nice mug of tea. Of course I have to have a tea towel tucked round my neck to catch the squirts - don't you find that grapefruit just squirts juice everywhere?

Lets see, peace talks, Bush condemns, three killed, riots, free speech under threat ...
All very fascinating but I do fancy another mug of tea!

Okay, gather up the mug, breakfast clutter, downstairs to the kitchen ...
MP3 is playing - Air, "Kelly Watch the Stars", a kind of innovative, but lighter than air song that just floats around and carries you right off.

Tidy things up, put things away.

You know the fascinating thing about this song by French band Air, is that part way through, they do this piano bit which is straight out of Alice Cooper's "My Stars" from the 1972 "Schools Out" album. Funny how you notice these things isn't it?

Now, kitchen ... kitchen ... what am I doing here?
Eh, not sure. Not to worry, quite fancy a mug of tea though, don't you?
... okay, boil the kettle, grab a tea-bag ...

... um, hold on, where's my mug gone?

My special tea mug, could've sworn I had it a minute ago,

hmmm, a mystery ... mug ... mug ... oh muggy, muggy where are you?

Ah, okay, maybe I don't want tea after all.
No! No tea, how about some cereal instead?
Yes, cereal sounds good, milky, crunchy, cereal. Lots of nuts, yes!
... grab my cereal bowl, now where's the cereal?

... open the cupboard, what's this ... ?

found my mug

Ah ha!! Mug found, mystery solved.
I do like mysteries just at that precise point when they've been all worked out and the answer pops right up, and suddenly, they're not mysteries any more.

Hey-hey, it's a good morning after all, wee-heeee.

Time for a tidy up.
in the bin with the grapefruit ... hang up the tea towel,
Wash the spoon ... put it away,
wash the cup ... into the drying rack.
Efficiency you see, Bunny people are very neat and tidy, especially on focused mornings.

Now. What am I doing with this bowl?

(scratches head) eh, that's funny ... maybe I was putting it away ... yes, that must be it.

okay ... all done in the kitchen ... back up to blog, yes, talk to my blogging friends, yippee!!

Okay I think I'll write a post. What can I talk about?
Hmmm ... (thinks) ... actually, just before doing that, I quite fancy a nice mug of tea ... and come to think of it, some breakfast too ... let's pop off down to the kitchen ...

MP3 is playing Crosby, Stills, Nash and Young, "Deja Vu". Now there's a great old classic, isn't it ... ?

Labels:

FAITHLESS - Bombs

I just saw an advance play of the new Faithless video for Bombs on Channel 4. Bombs is the new single from the "To All New Arrivals" album due to be released during November.

I don't want to rave but ... but I have to rave. This video is, is, is f******g magnificent. The worst part is that I can't find a link to it anywhere on-line although I've been searching for an hour.

There are some instrumental demos of the album and you can hear the FULL single as a Real Player stream here and I'll put the lyrics in this post.

The video shows warfare taking place in the same streets we live, while we wash our cars, while we eat our meals, it shows what happens when armed soldiers blow a hole through the side of a school, it shows nuclear warfare. Achh my words are useless.

SEE THIS VIDEO

It is simply the most accurate portrayal of the world I live in today. The single is good, but the video IS A MUST WATCH

BOMBS - lyrics:

We think we are heroes
We think we are kings
We plan all kinds of fabulous things
Oh look how great we have become

Key in the door
The moment I've longed for
Before my bag hit the floor
My adorable children rush up
Screaming for a kiss and a story
They've a gift to this world
My only claim to glory
I never knew sweeter days
Blows my mind like munitions
I'm amazed

So much heaven, so much hell
So much love, so much pain
So much more than I thought this world could ever contain
So much bought, so much sold
One man's loss, another man's gold
So much more than I thought this world could ever hold

We're just children, we're just dust
We are small, we are lost
And we're nothing
Nothing at all

One bomb
Whole block gone
Cant find my children
And dust covers the sun
Everywhere is noise, panic
And confusion
But to some another fun day in Babylon
I'm going to bury my wife
And dig up my gun
My life is done
So now I'm going to kill someone...

So much heaven, so much hell
So much love, so much pain
So much more than I thought this world could ever contain
So much bought, so much sold
One man's loss, another man's gold
So much more than I thought this world could ever hold

Labels:

the blog metamorphs into a diary

I've decided to stop calling this thing "Bunnyman's Blog". The phrase is nothing more than a tagline anyhow and the name "Little Holes" will stay.

So what's the big issue?

Well there isn't one. The small fly walking across my desk doesn't seem overly concerned and I don't think it's going to become an election issue. There are certainly far more interesting things going on in the world. For example, did you know that as of today, there are 822 known potentially hazardous asteroids? I think this means asteroids that might make a large house-shaped hole, in that spot where your house used to be. I don't think it means asteroids that can only be safely handled while wearing rubber gloves.

Anyway, I'll leave you to ponder over that curious and slightly worrying statistic, or even do some of the more interesting things you were going to do before you stumbled in here. Meanwhile I'll carry on rambling.

So I've decided to call it a type of journal. My first choice was to call it a diary but on checking the dictionary, it seems this might suggest a daily activity. That didn't quite sound right seeing as this place doesn't get updated every day. The definition for journal on the other hand, is:

"a personal record of events or matters of interest, written up every day or as events occur"

So you see, I get an opt-out clause to update things only as they happen.

Does any of this mean the content of the blog will change? Probably not, no. Whatever else I may have been writing (I've forgotten now), will carry on shortly.

The main thing is that I don't want to call it a blog anymore. Yes, yes, I know that it is a blog in a general sense and it's hosted by Blogspot which is a blogging service. The word blog though, is such a high level, generic term that it doesn't actually tell us very much. What's more, because so many other collections of writing are referred to as blogs, there's a tendency for visitors to think this might be like other blogs.

Of course it's no more a journal than a blog. The actual word which describes it precisely hasn't been invented yet. I have managed to come up with an interim prototype however.

wordiflossbag

I'm sure the good people who write the Oxford English Dictionary could come up with something much better but it seems there are lots of other unnamed things far more deserving than my blog which need a name, so my request at the far end of the queue right now.

There's a likelihood that tomorrow I'll forget all about this post and starting referring to my journal as a blog again or I might get confused and call it a diary. That's one of the problems with having a short term memory. But at least this does go to show what nonsense the brain can occupy its time with when it's too wet to go out and when there's not too much else to do.

...

Update. After approximately 12 seconds of random thought, a coffee and a dried date, I've completely changed my mind and decided instead to call it a diary.


Listening to: Yazoo, "Nobody's Diary"
Wondering: whether I should have call it a notebook?

Labels:

Blue Shoes on Blencathra

Blencathra is one of the two most northerly mountains of any significant size in the English Lake District. It lies to the east and marginally south of Skiddaw, the third highest mountain in England and it's probably the hill I've pee'd on more than any other in the British Isles.

I should take a moment to explain a habit of mine - that of referring to mountains as hills and just occasionally, vice versa. The Shorter Oxford dictionary sheds just a little light on this distinction. Apparently a hill is a small mountain and perhaps not surprisingly therefore, a mountain is a large hill. Well that helped, didn't it?

Wikipedia starts off well:

"The distinction between a hill and a mountain is unclear and largely subjective, but a hill is generally somewhat lower and less steep than a mountain."

but then adds much confusion:

"In the United Kingdom it is popularly believed that the Ordnance Survey defines a 'mountain' as a peak greater than 1000 feet (305 meters) above sea level, a belief which forms the basis of the film The Englishman Who Went Up a Hill But Came Down a Mountain"

I wonder if there's a polite phrase for "what a load of nonsense", perhaps one that I could easily retract should anyone wish to defend this 'belief' with a pitch fork?

Wikipedia also says:

"The Oxford English Dictionary, by contrast, suggests a limit of 2000 ft (610 m)."

Eh, okay, look, that's not in my 2 volume Shorter Oxford Dictionary. Maybe it's in the full 20 volume set but I can't afford that and it's really quite a heavy thing to lug around, so unless you happen to have it handy to disprove me, I'm going to state that any such definition is plainly pants!

Wikipedia does tell us:

"Mountains in Scotland are frequently referred to as "hills" no matter what their height, as reflected in names such as the Cuillin Hills and the Torridon Hills"

Now this is absolutely true and at the risk of making you dizzy by circling back to the Shorter Oxford definition, it's because mountains are big and hills are small. So Everest is a mountain and Ben Nevis, the highest piece of rock in the British Isles is nothing more than a wee hill. Simple, isn't it?

I'm sure you'll be relieved to have that ambiguity cleared up! Now, where was I ... oh, yes, pee'ing on Blencathra. Well it's just that I've been up there so often, you see. On busy climbing club meets it would be the last hill visited at the end of a weekend in the Lakes, a quick up and down on the way back to the motorway and the long minibus drive back to London. Several times recently, it has provided a quick piece of exercise while travelling up and down the country's M6 backbone, being as it is only 40 minutes legal drive along the A66.

photo of Blencathra

photo by Andrew Pescod

Once I even climbed it in a pair of blue, soft leather casual shoes (not suede no, and I can't sing like Elvis either). Now before being sued, I must state that you should never do this yourself, quite irresponsible. When on British mountains, always wear the proper equipment: sturdy boots, waterproofs and of course a large, noisy cowbell around your neck.

It was during a drive from deepest, darkest North Wales, to Scotland and I really needed some exercise. My accelerator pedal foot had cramp and I needed a pee badly. Of course, Blencathra was the obvious solution to both problems. Having made the 40 minute drive, parked the car, sorted out my rucksack, I realised I'd forgotten my scrambling boots. Darn it! After a few minutes deliberation - I was here now, weather was excellent, how could I not go up my favourite hill? I mean, there he was, waiting for me like an old friend. "Acht, I'll just have tae see how far I can get in these", I thought.

There were a couple of muddy sections on the lower hill-foot path. These I avoided by several spectacular, goat like leaps, and a very conveniently placed fence. The initial steep grass of the ascent itself, in this case, Halls Fell Ridge, was pretty straightforward as it was dry, but the upper rocky and spiky sections were a bit more painful, seeing as my soles were thin and quite soft. At the top, I sat for a few minutes with a bite to eat while nursing bruised feet, then headed off down Scales Fell. Unfortunately the grass on the way down, was quite damp and I found that soft, flat soles had a tendency to act like a skateboard on this surface. The descent therefore involved a very muddy and wet bum, quite a lot of, "whey-eeeey-thud" noises and the odd "splosh". The aim however was achieved. I no longer had cramp in my right foot, and I'd relieved myself twice, adding therefore to my cumulative score and ensuring no lack of flow for the local bottled spring water.

Blencathra shares an almost 10 square mile hinterland with Skiddaw and also has several other delights which I haven't touched on here. One of these is Sharp Edge, an entertaining but straightforward little rocky scramble above a beautiful pool of water called Scales Tarn. I hope to provide a small and hopefully photographic description of that little gem at some future point. However I hope this little taster has tempted you to explore what really is one of the finest and most conveniently situated hills in the Northern Lakes.


Listening to: Led Zeppelin, "Misty Mountain Hop"
Feeling: relieved


Note: hillwalking, climbing and mountaineering are activities with a danger of personal injury or death. Participants in these activities should be aware of and accept these risks and be responsible for their own actions and involvement.

Labels:

an update

I'm still having trouble remembering how to blog. Is there a medication for this type of painless but frustrating ailment? Perhaps a laxative of some kind? I must have a look through the bathroom cabinet, bound to be something there, maybe behind the out of date cough mixture. Meanwhile here's some bullet point blogging.

I'm very relieved to see that Riverbend posted this week. Following her 10 week hiatus I had feared the worst. Her subject matter doesn't make fun reading but nevertheless I'm much happier knowing she's still alive and able to post, though that in itself must be incredibly difficult.

The BBC's 2006 Children in Need appeal is under way. This aims to help fund selected charities, supporting children who have been abused, bullied, or who may be disabled, ill or homeless.
I have knowledge from childhood, of both bullying and abuse, so any and all support directed at these types of charity gets you a gold star here and maybe even my last chocolate too.

The Goldfish has posted an excellent article which provides a much needed reality check on the current veil debate.

Sadly, spam is bombarding this blog constantly now, so although I'd prefer not to, I've left the spam filter enabled for comments. I'm really sorry if this is a pain for anyone.

I've been avoiding a software update to my PC (Linux) for months, afraid of losing the ton of electronic data that's sitting precariously on my hard disks. Unfortunately, during a fit of paranoia I built a customised operating system which, although very secure, was ridiculously complex. The process to untangle this complexity is likely to be time consuming, but rest assured that if I don't post or comment for week or two, it won't be because I've expired.


Listening to: Pink Floyd, "Echoes"
Wondering: whether I really need female hormone therapy in order to multitask?

Labels:

... blank

Trying to blog but it isn't working. After a few days spent driving around attending to work related drudge, got back yesterday, but all I've managed is one comment. I go like this sometimes, vegetable like and empty-headed. There's no pain and everything else is dory-hunky but my mind is ... blank. In a way it's quite good because I can't even focus on feeling stressed or depressed, I'm just relaxed and blob-like. There's probably a Bunny strutting around somewhere, screaming his head off with frustration, but I can't find him right now.

Current theories are:
- lack of alcohol
- sugar imbalance
- some other form of chemical confusion
- dementia
- possession, by an egg white

I'm sitting with a cup of coffee and two dates, not sure why. They just seem to have appeared from somewhere. Assuming consciousness ever decides to reappear, I might be able to write something more useful ... soon ... or sometime.


Listening to: some funny French thing
Feeling: ... eh ... erm ... tries, tries hard ...
no sorry, it's all a blank.

um, bye for now?

Labels:

uuunnnnnnnnnnnngh

That's the best word I can think of right now, an extended form of the well known adjective, "ungh"! That's what it felt like this morning, trying to open my eyes. It was almost like I didn't remember how - and they were sooo heavy - and someone was sitting on them - and there was a dull numbness in my head, but especially up from my nose in a curious curve that, in much younger years I could probably have described mathematically, all the way round my eye sockets and up to Bunny summit. It was almost as though my mind was telling me not to return to the world - it simply wasn't worth it.

I slept in.

It's caught up with me, all these nights, struggling with sleep. I definitely set the alarm but when I woke, it was curiously switched off.

Anyway, quite a bit of rushing around today to catch up with two hours lost.

---

Now I was just scouting around my blog, checking the comments, seeing if anyone had said hello, when I noticed ... an entry ... about poetry or summat. Eh, don't know who wrote that or how it got in here. It's a puzzle.

---

This is going to be a week to juggle. I have to spend a few days on the move doing boring stuff but might get a day on the hills out of it. Probably won't be able to blog or comment much though, I'm going to be unplugged.

It's not that I don't have things to post, on the contrary, there are a lot of things, in fact probably hundreds, but many of them haven't made the leap, from thought held as chaotic electrical neuro-pattern, to jumbled notes on paper, let alone to passable blog entries.

Sometimes I wake with idle thoughts lingering, in that strange space that is waking up. Makes me wonder, whether those had been the thoughts I'd gone to sleep with.

Today's idle thought is: Should I restart this blog? Actually, maybe that wasn't it, maybe it was: Should I start a new blog, disconnected from this one?
Okay, tell you what, this week I'll try to remember why I was thinking that. It would probably help.

Oh, and another idle thought: Should I change my name? Train it all the way down to the St. Andrews Square Birth and Marriage Registry Office and change from Bunnyman to "perfectly normal person" using that deed pole thing. But then I haven't explained why I'm called Bunnyman because I was putting it off, so maybe I should build up the courage to post that first. errrm, perhaps you'd better ignore me altogether, just for the moment.

Oh, and another idle thought: ... ... um ... (scratches head) ... you'll be ever so relieved to know that I forgot this one.


Listening to: Gnarls Barkley, "Crazy"
still, yes, still the same tune, it's got stuck in my inner ear.

Labels:

Blogging can be hazardous

Sometimes I re-read my posts and wonder if there's a psychological condition called "regressing rabbit"?

Sometimes recently, en route to the kettle, I've found myself on the stairs doing a little smoochie dance to that Gnarls Barkley band. Can't provide a link to any music, but it's chilled, cool and uncluttered.

Sometimes, as I did on my last book shopping day, I write blog entries head-down while walking along the street.

wobbly blog writing

This really does take a lot of concentration, especially on keeping the writing lined up.

After looking up at that Pink Cadillac - a moment's lapse in concentration you see, that's all it took - I stumbled over the bonnet of a BMW pulling out of an alleyway. Notebook, dignity and blogger went for a burton but luckily no harm was done to the car. It did seem wise though to retreat from the incident before any thought of routine litigation could occur to the driver.

So you see, this blogging, it can be quite hazardous to your health and for that reason alone, I really can't recommend it to newcomers.


Listening to: Gnarls Barkley, "Crazy"

Labels:

Pumpkin to poetry?

Blink




...

(silence)

...


Blink


These stitches are parts of a life. The eventual intent was to represent a whole, using a patchwork of parts. But for the whole to have meaning, there must be balance: silly and serious, the mind and the soul, the light and the darkness.
Some parts touch other lives. No matter what plain words I use, no matter what meaning I intend to convey, should I succeed in my intent, someone will take hurt. I don't seek this. Once words are here, whatever I do with this blog, I can't retract the act of having said them. And I could never forgive myself for acting irresponsibly.

Yet, there may be a way, a format for this dilemma. Perhaps? Maybe?

Powerful poetry that cuts to the core essence of meaning and yet remains ambiguous, anonymous, abstract. A friend recently found an example of precisely that and you can see it here

These words aren't left lying like broken glass for the poet's unknowing adversary to tread, unaware and bare-footed; and yet, razor-sharp, they cut to the quick, exposing his meaning.

"Poetry is language at its most distilled..."
I am a pumpkin. I don't even know what a conjunction is. Even I, familiar with challenge, daunt at this particular path.

Pumpkin to poetry ... it's like walking from Pluto to the Pleiades

It's so much easier to scuttle off and hide under the bed.


Blink




right! how can i say this? when i started this blog, i wanted to do a whole bundle of things. one thing was to write about particular bits that are important to me. good bits, bad bits, wonderful bits, sad bits. but as soon as I start writing about ... about ... some stuff ... like love and the sad bits .. like being held together, like being ripped to shreds, i realised i'd be writing stuff that would hurt someone else. okay, someone else might not pop in here, might not find this place, but if they did i KNOW they'd be hurt. how can i do that? how can i hurt someone like that? and yet there's things i need to say.

then a friend of mine found this poem. see, some bloke found a way to say the kinds of things what i need to say but no-one's been hurt. it's like magic but it's called poetry.

but i can't can't can't can't can't can't do this stuff, can't can't do it. but it's the only way ...

?


Blink




Astronauts on the Wobble space observatory have reported a barely perceptible puff of energy, discovered on an outer satellite of the distant Sol star system, some 18,923 million, parsecs from Pumpkin Minor. Scientists speculate some new form of infinitesimally small micro-nova resulting from the implosion of an unknown, rapidly rotating body, possibly having two floppy ears and a fluffy tail.


Blink




YEEEEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARRGH


Blink




...

(silence)

...


Blink




These stitches are parts of a life. The eventual intent was to ...

Labels:

child and a Madonna

The BBC's Have you Say forum is evidence that Madonna's visit to Malawi certainly kicked up a range of public opinion. If news reports are accurate, she has now adopted David, a one year old boy, whose mother died following childbirth and who was being cared for at an Orphan Care Centre.

The boy's father has been quoted as saying, "I am very very happy because as you can see there is poverty in this village and I know he will be very well looked after in America."

So what gives? Good thing or bad? Should she remove a child from the culture that gave him his identify? I know nothing about the specific conditions of poverty his father lived under but average life expectancy for a Malawi male is 40 years, compare this to 74 in the U.S. That he'll get opportunity and education in the west, there can be no doubt but there isn't enough information to form an opinion on how his quality of life might compare to that in the village of his birth. He'll certainly have a momentous struggle to achieve an independent and normal life under the umbrella of such celebrity parenthood. And what when he returns to visit his father and his birth culture?

Of the person behind Madonna I have no thought at all. No liking, no animosity, how can I have any of these things for someone I don't know? What "Madonna" is, is a product, a trademark for an industry, a very carefully polished screenplay and performance, intended to achieve a very specific end. Quite what was her end here, I wonder?

But she has satisfied the boy's father and the Malawi legal system. Perhaps there's sufficient benefit from the media exposure Malawi has had in the past few days, another reminder of Africa's poverty. Yes, I know that tomorrow everyone will forget about the place, about Mchinji and it's Hope Orphan Care Centre, about Yohane Banda, the father, about his dead wife, Marita. But even a couple of days of media exposure can help generate charity funding that would otherwise have been less.

How do you measure that against the upheaval of one life?

Labels:

A week

It's been a hard week.

I don't mean the daily grind, routine gripes, sleep struggles, but with the fabric, with life's latticework.

Since Tuesday, I've been trying to write two posts although to be honest, they're so interwoven they could be expressed as one. After my 12th draft, I feel no closer to completion than at the beginning. If I'd befriended a deity, that deity would presumably have been patiently watching me go through this torture. Unfortunately, no deity I've met to date has been willing to act as more than a passive voyeur.

This is becoming a serious blockage, one that I now have to put aside. Others have written these things before and found ways of doing so. I must go, read, find my way over this particular hurdle, take some inspiration, steal an idea.

Every week needs balance, but balance this week is proving elusive.

The experiences of others can sometimes help us gain perspective on our own trials and for that reason, I'll include the following quote from a blogger.

"I just wish they would take the oil and go..." - Riverbend

Labels:

What shape is yours?

Have you ever looked inside your own belly-button? Can't say I have much, but now that I do, it is a bit curiously fascinating. Mine looks, well kind of like a spiral. Where do you think it goes?


photo of something spirally

I seem to have 'things' in here. Didn't realise it was such a store cupboard for blue fluff. What's odd is that I'm wearing a white t-shirt, so who put that blue fluff there? Should this be a concern? Does everyone have blue fluff?

Wish I hadn't started now, can't leave it alone.

Eeee-yukkie-poos, doesn't half look strange in a magnifying glass. Hmm, wonder if I should ... no, no, it would be like taking porny pics wouldn't it? Silly idea.

Photo by Alfonsator


Listening to: Sting, "The Windmills of Your Mind"
Feeling: anatomically curious

Labels:

Sanatorium for Disordered Bloggers

Well, that was quite interesting, that brief foray into seriousness. I think perhaps there'll be more of that to come.

Meanwhile, a man in a factory once told me that it didn't matter what you did or what mistakes you made, as long as you were consistent.

I thought about this for a while. Quite a long time actually. I even spent an a-g-e (if I told you how long, you wouldn't believe me), writing a humungous ramble on the subject. Luckily, I re-read it, decided it was utter mush and chucked in in the wastebin.

I was helped along by this quote I found while reading a very basic photography tutorial on photo.net

"A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds" - Ralph Waldo Emerson

While it's true that I'm a wrinkled little monster with a head like an inverted tardis: huge on the outside but with enough grey matter to fill a thimble; I also have a history of rebellion against prescribed thinking and established patterns of behaviour. This quote has sent me into the cupboard looking for my Che Guevara khakis and beret.

Therefore at the risk of being referred to a sanatorium for disordered bloggers, consistency has gone out the window, possibly closely followed by popularity (what is that?), and I now feel compelled to restate my identity by posting something quite daft.

First though, a question. In the midst of the ramble that's now gone through the shredder, I found myself becoming quite confused over the ebb phrase. I was wondering whether it should be "ebb and tide" or "ebb and flow"? Tried an Internet search but the results page returned an article written by a Rabbi, a document about Hamas operational strategy and an interview with a writer of romantic fiction. Fascinating though these may be to whoever might want to read them, they didn't help me with my question. Does anyone know? Should it be tide or should it be flow?

And how on earth has the time got to almost 5:30 in the morning? I need to be up and doing severely boring things in a couple of hours. Hmm, stay up and regret it for the rest of the day, or find some alcohol, get one hours sleep, then regret it for the rest of the day? What a choice. Sorry if none of this post makes sense :)


Listening to: Grant Lee Buffalo, "Jupiter Teardrop"
Wondering: whether I should write a manifesto?

Labels:

Was Jack Straw acting responsibly?

I'm going in a completely different direction with this post, raising a question about something I'm not particularly qualified to talk about. A risk maybe, but a view that I must express nevertheless.

A second UK minister has joined the debate about Muslim women who veil their faces.

Before going any further, I should point out that I'm not particularly knowledgeable about Muslim culture or religion, and in this post, I'm not talking of enforced wearing of the veil, only those cases where women choose of their own free will to wear it.

If anyone missed the news this week, Jack Straw wrote an entry for the Lancashire Evening Telegraph where he said: "Above all, it was because I felt uncomfortable about talking to someone 'face-to-face' who I could not see." he was referring to a lady wearing a full veil, whom he met almost a year ago at his constituency office.

I don't know much about the veil, and the Muslim community in the UK appears divided on the issue of whether the Koran requires it or whether the Hijab (headscarf) is sufficient (as discussed here). I have read articles where women have said this should be a choice for the individual. For my part, I respect that entirely. Although it has no religious connotation and I am not comparing like for like, I don't accept that I should be forced to remove my jacket hood or my dark sunglasses in order to have a conversation. It's a choice I make. I don't expect to be told that I shouldn't wear a hoodie, a dress or a wedding veil because it might damage community relations. But that's by and by.

What I'm curious about is whether Jack Straw had opened a debate with Muslim groups before bringing this to the public eye. I'm not seeing anything to suggest he did, which leads me to:

my point - I question whether he was being responsible in the way he raised the issue.

I'm making no comment on whether there should be a debate. I think all sides accept that a debate now would be helpful. It's simply whether Jack Straw should have raised this in such a confrontational way without first having brought at least some Muslim groups on board.

I think anyone in the UK today would have to be living in a cabbage patch, not to realise that members of the Muslim culture feel very strongly about their identity and their religion. To publish this in the national press without having consulted Muslim councils seems somewhat naive to me. Since he'd been mulling things over for a whole year before publishing his remarks, he can hardly argue that a consultation process would have taken too long.

The way he's raised the issue does increase the risk that before any debate has taken place, any women who continue to choose to wear a veil, are much more likely to be singled out as causing unnecessary social division by an already divided public. Although in the long term, this debate may result in less cultural tension and violence, in the short term it seems likely that some people may suffer unnecessary discrimination.

It didn't have to be this way.

In western society, we're not only about barging down the door with a battering ram. If Jack Straw wants a more integrated society, I feel he should begin by sensitively involving those he feels are being separatist.

Labels:

Too many notebooks?

I've just mislaid a notebook. It's the yellow one with the black rings, my back-up notebook. Ooooh this is so annoying!! It's not over there, nor in favoured rucksack. I've checked the fridge and the toaster.

I have a notebook for photography, one for painting and art (quite empty this one), one for reading and writing, one general 'always on my desk' notebook, a PC/Linux quick ref notebook, one 'always with me' notebook that stays in my rucksack, one back-up 'always with me' notebook, in case I lose the first one, a holiday notebook, a car/driving notebook, an electronic diary/address/lists notebook, a 'heard on the radio' notebook ... eleven so far ...

See it's because I'm not good at working with these digital Palmy things and I generally need to leave a notebook conveniently placed near the thing I'm making notes about.

Losing notebooks using this system happens often. I wonder if I need a notebook to keep a track of my notebooks? Maybe I should reduce the number of notebooks before I get to thirteen?

Wait! Found it, ha-ha diddly-dee. It was under art notebook (the empty one), which was under my blank unused artist's sketch pad, which was under my unused copy of "Drawing for the Artistically Undiscovered", which was under the A4 folder that's been holding some of my post scribbles. As you can tell, I have a very organised desk here at my blog station and everything has its place.

Now then what on earth did I want it for ...


Listening to: Neil Young, "Helpless"
Wondering: where I put the toast?

Labels:

Gus Gus

I sometimes get called "honey". It's odd to get called "honey". It makes me think of sticky things, or impossibly happy American households, or the next Hollywood blockbuster, "Honey, I licked the lodger". Mind you, it's better than some of the other things I've been called that are more slimy than sticky.

A very, very long time ago when I was a teenage wild thing and a struggling underage pub customer, people called me "Gus". I mean what a name, have you tried that on your lips? It sounds like the stuff that might squirt out if you squeezed that spot, the one on the end of my nose, between your fingernails. Or worse, what might be released, following an ingestive delay, as a result of curry washed down by three pints of Guinness. I used to hate being called "Gus".

Which brings me to the subject of this post, Gus Gus. While it may be tempting to court panic on the basis that there might be two of me, I'm actually referring to a band called Gus Gus. I was wondering whatever happened to them so I did a quick internet search (I try not to call them 'G--gle' searches 'cos that's product placement and although I'm sometimes naughty, I don't like placing products), and found their website.

Now because I haven't got anything else to blog about today, but felt like blogging nonetheless, I'm going to tell you about it.

You see, it's quite cool really. I'm not saying you should go there, but should you suffer from a little nag of musical curiosity, you'd find some talk of pineapples and a chap called President Bongo and his Uncle Siggi.
But what's interesting is that I can navigate through to the audio and listen in to 2 minute, in-browser MP3 song extracts. In case you were visited by that little nag, I must warn you - these are seriously funky song extracts.

It turns out that this band I used to listen to back in the 90's has started their own record label (they used to be with 4AD). There's no more effective way to describe it than to let them do it themselves:

"PINEAPPLERECORDS is a record company from Reykjavik, Iceland. It is run and owned by electronic soulmusicians calling thems(elfs) gusgus, a band that loves Elvis. Pineapplerecords won't be able to tell you why or how they will only put out hit singles but they will surely be able to tell you how to fry them pineapples: Cut down the pineapple, fry in butter on low temperature for 15minutes, soak in rum and light up ... flambeé! Serve, eat and dance (take 1 hour checking out birds before cutting the rug)."


picture of Gus Gus members

Now I'm not entirely sure which 'birds' need to be checked or quite why the rug needs to be cut, and some of them do look a little odd, but I just learned how to cook a pineapple! Isn't it great?

I can even go to the This is Normal album and listen to the first record I ever heard of theirs, Ladyshave. It still gets me smoochin' with myself across the dance floor and wobbling with funky vibes, in fact I'm doing it right now!

(was that product placement?)

Labels:

I bought books

This post is about books. Scary books, controversial books, challenging books, and wonderful books.

Sorry but it got quite long. I suggest a coffee, a chocolate biscuit and a seat. And look, you're not allowed to jump to the picture at the end (which isn't really there), see what I bought and then tootle off. NOT allowed!

The day started off badly, running on a faulty autopilot. Bookshops are in 'big town' and trips to 'big town' involve a car journey. After thirty minutes of driving daydreams, something seemed quite wrong with the view out of the window. It was ... it was ... I was heading towards the wrong 'big town'!?! Sometimes, just sometimes I really don't like my peanut sized brain! Quickly did a U-turn, feeling quite guilty for this unnecessary little addition to global warming, all my combusted fumes helping to pollute the sky.

The sky in return, wasn't at all happy. It turned grey, then black, then it rained, a torrential rain that slows traffic to a crawl. But nothing was going to spoil my book day! I'd brought a cagoule for my rucksack (it's true, I even took a pic to prove it).


my little rucksack inside it's cagoule

So although my trainers were soaked after a few minutes and rain was dripping into my eyes, rucksack and precious tokens were snug and dry. I had gift tokens worth £22 that would only work in W.H.Smith and a £10 book token to be spent anywhere. With nine books on my list this meant £3.55 per title, or some fierce choices or even scarier, having to spend actual cash! Cash, you see, is in short supply right now.

There was one priority, one book that I really wanted! William Horwood wrote a duology called "The Wolves of Time". Now it's not about people (actually the final volume is and it's not as good), it's about wolves but look, these wolves have characters that most wobbly humans would die for. The story is a journey, and it's about courage, trust and love, murder, betrayal and hope. I bought this five or six years ago, and it's been lovingly and regularly re-read since.

So, after reading the Goldfish's excellent review of a book called "Skallagrigg" by the same Author, I was fascinated to see what a versatile and courageous writer he seems to be. There's a catch though - you can't buy Skallagrigg on Amazon unless you pay for a rare and ridiculously expensive used version.

This didn't bode well - but - today was my special book day and having spent time and effort researching, I decided to be optimistic. The shelves in Seriously Big Bookshop One, were ordered by genre and seeing as I didn't know whether the titles on my list were crime thrillers, horror stories, fantasies or general fiction, it seemed sensible to ask an assistant.

" 'Skallagrigg' by William Horwood, do you stock this?" After a minute spent trying to spell it for him, he said, "I'll have to go look on the computer, it'll be about 5 or 10 minutes", and off he went. Meanwhile I started looking for Dean Koontz. Haven't got a clue about Dean Koontz so I checked crime, then fiction, then not sure where I was but ... found it! "Odd Thomas". At first the writing seemed mechanical, mentioning lawyers and police, slightly hard work for me but then I flicked randomly to page 139:

"From the hamper, Stormy produced a tupperware container filled with shelled walnuts that she had deep-fried and seasoned lightly with both salt and sugar".

Walking slowly back along the aisle, reading more, an exciting bit of storyline was coming, this was getting interesting, then ... I almost stumbled into the assistant. He ... he ...

was holding ... A COPY OF SKALLAGRIGG Yipeeeee!!
I jumped up and down child-like, "Yesss, brilliant, Wow!"
I was being loud, people were looking, I didn't care.
I wanted to cuddle him but he recoiled so I slowly calmed down, realising it might be better for him if I emulated a sane adult, "Thank you, I had hoped but really didn't expect this. Thanks really!"

Now I knew - knew that today - today I would find and buy every single book on my list! Knew it with a certainty!! Do you ever get days like that?

The next item was a challenge, "Lolita" by Vladimir Nabokov. The Amazon reviewers loved or hated this novel, they said things like, sinister, disturbing, paedoph---. Now you see why it might be a challenge. (I cut the paedo word short because I don't want Google thinking this post might be a discussion of that particular topic.)
But they also said:

"the book took me a long time to read, far longer than many larger novels ... alliteration, puns, word-play, allusions, metaphor, simile, poetry, lyricism, humour, wit, sarcasm".

Considering my limited attention span and lack of literary education this seemed a doubtful choice and possibly over ambitious, so I started reading, and something surprising happened, listen ... page 166:

"A combination of naïveté and deception, of charm and vulgarity, of blue sulks and rosy mirth, Lolita when she chose, could be a most exasperating brat ... Sweet hot jazz, square dancing, gooey fudge sundaes, musicals, movie magazines ..."

Carrying on, the words were honey flowing into my head, like an injection of rich vanilla fudge. Although there were snippets I didn't understand, it was wonderful. I could picture myself sitting for hours tracing through these pages, with a table and a large dictionary. Not sure how I'll deal with the challenge of the subject matter, but how could I not buy this book?

A problem was brewing, these paperbacks didn't all fit into my £10 token. I chose "Skallagrigg", got a penny in change, then thought for a minute. Rarely do I find good material to read in a stationers - previous gift tokens have left me with a large collection of pens and envelopes. But I took my optimism off to W.H.Smith anyhow ... to be pleasantly surprised: they had both Koontz and Lolita.

Browsing through the shelves, took me past a small girl at a window looking out from a title called "Roots of Evil" by Sarah Rayne. Anyone know this author? I hate being swayed by cover images, but this one has been doctored to look particularly haunting. It drew me because her facial features reminded me of Jody Foster. The back cover read:

"Lucy ... discovers the truth about her family's dark and often poignant history - a history which spans the glittering concert halls of 1920s Vienna to the bleak environs of wartime Auschwitz."

Auschwitz. That word has some meaning, and a challenge, for me. The challenge is a strange, complex thing, nothing to do with xenophobia or being Jewish. Maybe I'll blog about it one day, if I can find the words. It also seemed to be about a film called Alraune and there's some blurb inside the cover about this being a real film though I haven't heard of it.

Page 251, I read:

"Mariana Trent was trying to get through the tiny window, crying out to the people below to help her. It was appalling to see her like this, the silk skirt rucked up above her knees, her legs cut and bleeding from the jagged window-frame, and her face crimson and shiny from the heat. There was a terrible moment when Lucy thought her mother's head looked exactly like a giant baked apple in the oven - just at the moment when the apple-skin had turned scarlet with the heat and was starting to split, and all the juices were running out".

Ouch, a jolt of emotive shock treatment, that was a bit raw! But the challenge had already bitten, the title joined the other two, the only purchase of the day not recommended by a blogger.

Three books, £22 worth of tokens, three pennies in change, I went off smiling and happy, to Seriously Big Bookshop Two. This one had a café, and lots of stairs to climb to the fiction floor, the aim being to find "Shantaram" by Gregory David Roberts. Considering the title and knowing from the reviews and from Sketches that this was set in India, it seemed I may have met a stumbling block. Maybe I couldn't buy this book here?

Still, I took my optimism to the enquiry desk, "Hi, I'm looking for a something called Shantar... um, Shantar .."
Took out my list to check the spelling and show him but he just looked at me and said, "Shantaram."
"You've heard of this book?", I asked surprised,
"I've read it", he said.
"You've read it? Really? What's it like?"
"It's a great read", he took me right over to the shelf and pulled it out.
I could hardly believe it, but of course, this was the day when I was going to get everything on my list. Now I loved finding this book but I have a bone to pick with Sketches. There are nine hundred and thirty-three pages and the writing's small, and it took the author thirteen years to write!! I would risk a literary hernia here, so it seemed wise to sample it over a coffee.

On the way, looked at Bill Bryson's "Short History of Nearly Everything". Liked it a lot but the first thing I read was: "it isn't easy being an organism".
Now that's the kind of thing I'd say. This will sound pretty silly but the more I read, the more this similarity left me thinking that I might blog less, because his dry wit is so like mine (although he's accomplished and I'm a peanut), that I'd end up unintentionally plagiarising. Had no choice but to put it down, even though it's the kind of book I'd love. Daft, aren't I?

I strolled past a non-fiction shelf, and saw but didn't stop to read. "Who Won the Oil Wars", published by a suspiciously named Conspiracy Books. Why does it use the past tense, is it a foregone conclusion now? "PetroDollar Warfare", "Blood and Oil in Central Asia", a whole stream of oil based views.

A political reaction crept into the first draft of this post, polluted it, polluted my happy post, I have since stripped it out!

Picked up a black paperback that had crept into my peripheral vision, an impulse, and kept walking.

The café was busy, couldn't get a good seat. You know, the tables upstairs where you can disappear into the folds of the shelving and furtively read, or observe other book-junkies (why did I say that? can't call myself a book-junkie), so I was confined to the main floor, a table already cluttered with someone else's leftovers - and the coffee was slightly too watery, too bitter and not remotely hot.

The black book was "Lila: An Inquiry into Morals" by Robert Pirsig (who wrote "Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance"), and I'd grabbed it mistakenly thinking it might be light reading. Ouch! What weighty subject matter. But then I've always been curiously attracted to philosophy, a moth-like fascination with enlightened ideas. Read this for a while wondering if I could cope, this kind of stuff might take months-years to read.

I put it down and picked up Shantaram. Page 208:

"Bombay's lepers ... At other times they set up their camp on a swampy patch of vacant land or some outfall for industrial waste. When I first visited them with Abdullah, that day, I found that they'd built their ragged shelters on the rusty stones of a railway siding near the suburb of Khar"

I became curious about Bombay (now Mumbai) and it's lepers, but then something odd happened. It went on to describe a railway depot:

"a vast shunting area - an open space marked by dozens of railway lines and their confluences. At the outer edges, high wire fences enclosed the space."

This description, it jogged a memory, a forgotten memory, of me standing in a huge railway depot one night. India, over twenty-five years ago. It was Jammu Railway Station, and I was lying between stationary goods carriages in the dark, on some filthy, sooty ground, some distance from the main station. I had dysentery. I was trying to get out of the place. I'd forgotten this memory.

There was absolutely no doubt now, about Shantaram, but I had to wake myself from this odd recollection. There were more things on my list and time was passing.

I'd only managed two sips of coffee. Nowhere to take my mess and no space on the serving counter, so my own cluttered leftovers were added to the junk on the table for the next customer.

Having run out of tokens, I paid for Shantaram using hard cash then headed back to Seriously Big Bookshop One. Now, to avoid leaving you with the idea that I have a fascination with bookshops, I'll tell a fib and say that my body needed the exercise.

Back out, into the rain, a fifteen minute walk then up the stairs to Richard Bach's "Illusions of a Reluctant Messiah". Opening this, I read about someone walking on water then swimming in rock. A spiritual but seemingly non-religious, exploration. The format was small and thin, reminding me of a miniature book of poetry I once saw by Kahlil Gibran, a Lebanese author, but the price was the same as the largest paperback I'd bought so far. Cash was running short now and there was still something else to buy so this would have to wait. Tried to put it back on the shelf - a tight fit on a packed shelf - but it wouldn't go. After a minute of unsuccessful squeezing it popped back out and landed on the floor, flipping open and releasing my folded book list which I must have left inside! Dearie me, that was close, how far would I have gotten without my book list!?

Found Patrick White's "The Tree of Man" and studied it. There was something about this title and that something was nagging at me. Trying to remember, but not really a memory, more like a feeling. I think I have this book! One corner in my acre of junk storage at home, is devoted to boxes of reading material and I think Patrick White is in there. No memory of having read it though. I put it back down and resolved to search through my junk.

My last visit was to children's 8-12, reached via a journey to the basement. At the bottom of the stairs, was one of those little sights that stops you in your tracks. The first shelves any basement book-buff gets to see in this shop, are Islam and Judaica, right next to each other. A large green copy of "History of Islamic Philosophy" was sitting almost alongside Anne Frank's Diary. I had been wondering what might constitute, 'living dangerously' for bookshop staff. Maybe this poignant juxtaposition of cultural reading is the result?

Was quite tempted to flick through "History" but it was an almost three inch thick humungous monster of a paperback. Perhaps some knowledgeable person can explain it to me, over lunch and a couple of lifetimes.

Foraging, I browsed and picked up "Introducing Psychological Research", a pet subject of mine (cough, choke). Um, no, what was interesting was the quite fascinating image on the front, a colour and shape piece by Kandinsky. Hadn't seen this before. See how easily I get distracted?

Finally, I found my last book, a fantasy novel by Garth Nix called "Lirael". Flipped it open, page 169:

" 'Not even time to cast a diamond of protection', Sam muttered to himself. He had never actually been into Death by himself before. He'd gone only with his mother, the Abhorsen ..."

Anyone familiar with Philip Pullman's "Dark Materials" trilogy will know why the idea of "going into Death" can make refreshing and unusual reading. I knew now that I'd love this book. But there was (another) catch. It was the second in a series and the first title, "Sabriel", wasn't on the shelf.

Again I tracked down an assistant, who, after helpfully checking her computer said, "Yes, there's one in stock", but then she couldn't find it either. We hunted through adjacent shelves with no luck. She looked at me with a "Sorry" in her eyes.
"No!", I thought, this can't be allowed to happen, it's my special book day!! I desperately tried to think of a spell I could use, maybe a 'triangle of finding' ... instead I pulled a face, popped my eyes out, squeezed a pair of fluffy eyebrows together and tried to look childishly disappointed and upset. She recoiled as if some evil wizzard of fiction had suddenly come alive, but it seemed to work, "Actually we do have another children's section. Wait here and I'll go and have a look". She turned and half-walked, half-ran.

Meanwhile I browsed. Where did all these Philip Pullman titles come from? "I Was a Rat", "The Scarecrow and His Servant", "Count Karstein". None of these are mentioned in my editions of "Dark materials" or the Sally Lockhart series and I'd never seen them before. Why has no one told me of this wonderful, heavenly place called Children's 8-12? I was just about to pick up "Scarecrow" when the brave assistant, the gorgeous assistant I'd just fallen in love with, appeared and presented me with the last copy of "Sabriel".


take a look at my booksies

So now what?

Here are 3,396 pages of new fiction to read. That's new fiction, and doesn't include the re-reading I had hoped to get in, of "The Wolves of Time", "His Dark Materials", "The Silmarillion" and "Lord of The Rings", totalling 3,810 pages. Nor does it include the 7,078 pages of "The History of Middle Earth" and "The Complete Letters of Vincent Van Gogh", both of which I promised to try and get through this century.

With a grand total of 14,284 pages, I feel like a tortoise who has set himself the task of climbing Mount Everest.

How can I possibly fit all these words into such a small brain, a brain which regularly exhibits the consistency and intellectual capacity of a teaspoon of peanut butter?

Heeeeeeeeeeeeeeellllp!!!

And ...... what to read first?

Labels: ,

Routine Housekeeping

My book post is becoming a monster and I haven't even finished it yet. I need sleep but meanwhile, some interim silliness.

Now and again it's good to tidy-up your blog. You know, remove those old images, the ones from way back that no-one looks at anymore, or freshen up your header pic and toss the old one in the trashcan.

A simple bit of routine housekeeping, it should be a doddle. Surely no-one would get upset if you tidied up your own images?


Listening to: Fields of the Nephilim, "Endemoniada"
Wondering: which planet some people live on

Labels: